Here’s a gut-wrenching update for Philadelphia Eagles fans: Lane Johnson, the team’s stalwart right tackle, has suffered a Lisfranc injury, according to sources who spoke to ESPN’s Adam Schefter. While it’s not expected to end his season, this injury could sideline him for a significant stretch, potentially landing him on injured reserve. But here’s where it gets even more concerning: Johnson’s absence comes at a critical time for an offensive line that’s already been tested by injuries this season.
The injury occurred during Sunday night’s hard-fought 16-9 win over the Detroit Lions, specifically on a third-and-short play where Saquon Barkley’s run was stopped short. Johnson exited the field in the first quarter, walking gingerly after a brief stop at the medical tent. He was replaced by Fred Johnson, though the team offered no immediate updates post-game.
At 35, Lane Johnson has battled his fair share of injuries this year. He missed a significant portion of last week’s matchup against the Green Bay Packers due to a left ankle injury, only to return late in the game. Earlier in the season, he was in and out of the lineup because of a stinger. Despite these setbacks, Johnson’s performance has been nothing short of remarkable—he entered Sunday’s game with a flawless 0.0 knockdown percentage, meaning he hadn’t allowed a single sack or QB hit.
And this is the part most people miss: Johnson isn’t just any offensive lineman. A two-time first-team All-Pro and six-time Pro Bowler, he’s been a cornerstone of the Eagles’ offensive success. His absence could force the team to reshuffle their line dynamics, potentially exposing Jalen Hurts to more pressure.
But here’s the controversial question: With Johnson’s injury history this season, should the Eagles have rested him more proactively to avoid this situation? Or is this simply the cost of fielding a veteran player in a high-impact position? Let us know your thoughts in the comments—this debate is sure to spark differing opinions among fans and analysts alike.
